Displayed category theory MOC

Displayed category

A displayed category 𝖣 over a category 𝖒 consists of1 cat

  • for each object 𝑐 βˆˆπ–’0, a collection 𝖣𝑐 of objects over 𝑐;

  • for each morphism 𝑓 βˆˆπ–’(π‘Ž,𝑏), π‘₯ βˆˆπ–£π‘Ž and 𝑦 βˆˆπ–£π‘, a set of morphisms from π‘₯ to 𝑦 over 𝑓, denoted 𝖣𝑓(π‘₯,𝑦) or π‘₯ →𝑓𝑦;

  • for each object 𝑐 βˆˆπ–’0 and π‘₯ βˆˆπ–£π‘, a morphism 1π‘₯ βˆˆπ–£1𝑐(π‘₯,π‘₯);

  • for all morphisms 𝑓 βˆˆπ–’(π‘Ž,𝑏) and 𝑔 βˆˆπ–’(𝑏,𝑐) and objects π‘₯ βˆˆπ–£π‘Ž, 𝑦 βˆˆπ–£π‘, and 𝑧 βˆˆπ–£π‘, a composition function

    (∘):𝖣𝑔(𝑦,𝑧)×𝖣𝑓(π‘₯,𝑦)β†’π–£π‘”βˆ˜π‘“(π‘₯,𝑧)

where these data satisfy

  • 1𝑦 βˆ˜Β―π‘“ =¯𝑓 and ¯𝑓 ∘1π‘₯ =¯𝑓 for any ¯𝑓 βˆˆπ–£π‘“(π‘₯,𝑦);
  • Β―β„Ž ∘(¯𝑔 βˆ˜Β―π‘“) =(Β―β„Ž βˆ˜Β―π‘”) βˆ˜Β―π‘“ for appropriately typed ¯𝑓,¯𝑔,Β―β„Ž.

In the quintessential examples, we think of an object π‘₯ over π‘Ž as a structure on π‘Ž, and a morphism ¯𝑓 βˆˆπ–£π‘“(π‘₯,𝑦) as a witness that ¯𝑓 is structure-preserving. Thus displayed categories are naturally used in a paradigm with propositions as types. This motivates the total category βˆ«π–’π–£ as the category of structures and structure morphisms, defined as follows:

  • an object (π‘Ž,π‘₯) βˆˆβˆ«π–’π–£ is a pair consisting of an object π‘Ž βˆˆπ–’ and an object π‘₯ βˆˆπ–£π‘Ž over π‘Ž, so that

    (βˆ«π–’π·)0:=βˆ‘π‘Žβˆˆπ–’0π–£π‘Ž
  • a morphism (𝑓,¯𝑓) :(π‘Ž,π‘₯) β†’(𝑏,𝑦) is a pair where 𝑓 βˆˆπ–’(π‘Ž,𝑏) and ¯𝑓 βˆˆπ–£π‘“(π‘₯,𝑦), so that

    (βˆ«π–’π–£)((π‘Ž,π‘₯),(𝑏,𝑦))=βˆ‘π‘“βˆˆπ–’(π‘Ž,𝑏)𝖣𝑓(π‘₯,𝑦)
  • composition and identities are induced from those of 𝖒 and 𝖣 in the straightforward way, and similarly for the axioms.

This is naturally equipped with a forgetful functor

πœ‹π–£1:βˆ«π–’π–£β†’π–’.


develop | en | SemBr

Footnotes

  1. 2017. Displayed categories ↩