Category theory MOC

Limit and colimit

Limits and colimits generalize many universal constructions in category theory. Since these are cones characterised by universal properties, they are sometimes called universal cones and universal cocones.

As defined below, one takes the (co)limit of a small diagram of a given shape 𝖩. When (co)limits exist for all diagrams of a given shape in a category 𝖒, we say 𝖒 has 𝖩-(co)limits. If 𝖒 has 𝖩-(co)limits for any small (resp. finite) 𝖩, then 𝖒 is (co)complete (resp. finitely (co)complete).

Definition

The limit of a diagram π’Ÿ :𝖩 →𝖒 is a cone πœ‚ from limβŸ΅β‘π’Ÿ to π’Ÿ such that given any other cone 𝛾 from 𝐡 to π’Ÿ, there exists a unique morphism β„Ž βˆˆπ–’(𝐡,limβŸ΅β‘π’Ÿ) such that for all 𝑖,𝑗 βˆˆπ–© and 𝛼 βˆˆπ–©π‘–,𝑗 cat

https://q.uiver.app/#q=WzAsNCxbMSwwLCJCIl0sWzEsMiwiXFx2YXJwcm9qbGltIFxcbWF0aHNjciBEIl0sWzAsMywiXFxtYXRoc2NyIERfaSJdLFsyLDMsIlxcbWF0aHNjciBEX2oiXSxbMCwxLCJoIiwxLHsic3R5bGUiOnsiYm9keSI6eyJuYW1lIjoiZGFzaGVkIn19fV0sWzIsMywiXFxtYXRoc2NyIERfXFxhbHBoYSJdLFsxLDIsIlxcZXRhX2kiLDJdLFsxLDMsIlxcZXRhX2oiXSxbMCwyLCJcXGdhbW1hX2kiLDIseyJjdXJ2ZSI6Mn1dLFswLDMsIlxcZ2FtbWFfaiIsMCx7ImN1cnZlIjotMn1dXQ==

commutes. Informally, the limit of π’Ÿ is the β€˜shallowest’ cone over π’Ÿ.1

Dually, the colimit of π’Ÿ :𝖩 →𝖒 is a cocone πœ– from limβŸΆβ‘π’Ÿ to π’Ÿ such that given any other cocone 𝛾 from 𝐡 to π’Ÿ there exists a unique morphism β„Ž βˆˆπ–’(limβŸΆβ‘π’Ÿ,𝐡) such that for all 𝑖,𝑗 βˆˆπ–© and 𝛼 βˆˆπ–©π‘–,𝑗

https://q.uiver.app/#q=WzAsNCxbMSwzLCJCIl0sWzEsMSwiXFx2YXJpbmpsaW0gXFxtYXRoc2NyIEQiXSxbMCwwLCJcXG1hdGhzY3IgRF9pIl0sWzIsMCwiXFxtYXRoc2NyIERfaiJdLFsxLDAsImgiLDEseyJzdHlsZSI6eyJib2R5Ijp7Im5hbWUiOiJkYXNoZWQifX19XSxbMiwzLCJcXG1hdGhzY3IgRF9cXGFscGhhIl0sWzIsMSwiXFxldGFfaSIsMl0sWzMsMSwiXFxldGFfaiJdLFsyLDAsIlxcZ2FtbWFfaSIsMix7ImN1cnZlIjoyfV0sWzMsMCwiXFxnYW1tYV9qIiwwLHsiY3VydmUiOi0yfV1d

commutes. Informally, the colimit of π’Ÿ is the shallowest cone under π’Ÿ.

Properties

Examples


tidy | en | SemBr | en

Footnotes

  1. 2020, Topology: A categorical approach, Β§4.2, pp. 77–79 ↩