Conversely, any representation of the group ring with these properties corresponds to a Unitary representation,1 defined by
Proof
Let .
Then
satisfying property 1; and
satisfying property 2; and
satisfying property 3; and
satisfying property 4.
For the converse, let be a -representation obeying properties 1–4.
We define .
It follows that
as required above, but is a unitary representation?
From the property 2 it follows that ,
so is indeed a representation of .
From property 3 it follows that
,
so is unitary as required.