Natural Heisenerg algebras
Let
define Heisenberg algebras,
called the
for
Modules
Heisenberg modules
Let
setting
for
Triangular modules
Defining the linear form
Then then the triangular module and Heisenberg module
there exists a unique contravariant form
with the properties
for
Natural Heisenberg module π πΌ
Let
We define the natural
with the
In the case
Conventionally we will take9
Virasoro representation
Letting
where
Then
is a graded representation of the Virasoro algebra
Proof
For
, β β π₯ , and π β β€ , it follows from the commutation relations on π β π that π [ πΏ ( π ) , β ( π ) ] = β 1 2 d i m β‘ π₯ β π = 1 β β β π [ β ( π ) , β π ( π β β ) β π ( β ) ] = β 1 2 d i m β‘ π₯ β π = 1 β β β π [ β ( π ) , β π ( π β β ) ] β π ( β ) β 1 2 d i m β‘ π₯ β π = 1 β β β π β π ( π β β ) [ β ( π ) , β π ( β ) ] = β 1 2 d i m β‘ π₯ β π = 1 β β β π β¨ β , β π β© π πΏ π + π β β β π ( β ) β 1 2 d i m β‘ π₯ β π = 1 β β β π β π ( π β β ) β¨ β , β π β© π πΏ π + β = β 1 2 d i m β‘ π₯ β π = 1 π β¨ β , β π β© β π ( π + π ) β 1 2 d i m β‘ π₯ β π = 1 π β¨ β , β π β© β π ( π + π ) = β π β ( π + π ) Hence for
with π , π β β€ and π β 0 , π + π β 0 [ πΏ ( π ) , πΏ ( π ) ] = 1 2 d i m β‘ π₯ β π = 1 β π β π [ πΏ ( π ) , β π ( π β π ) β π ( π ) ] = 1 2 d i m β‘ π₯ β π = 1 β π β π β π ( π β π ) [ πΏ ( π ) , β π ( π ) ] + 1 2 d i m β‘ π₯ β π = 1 β π β π [ πΏ ( π ) , β π ( π β π ) ] β π ( π ) = β 1 2 d i m β‘ π₯ β π = 1 β π β π ( π β π ( π β π ) β π ( π + π ) + ( π β π ) β π ( π + π β π ) β π ( π ) ) = β 1 2 d i m β‘ π₯ β π = 1 β π β π ( ( π β π ) β π ( π β π + π ) β π ( π ) + ( π β π ) β π ( π + π β π ) β π ( π ) ) = ( π β π ) πΏ ( π + π ) The only remaining case is essentially that
and π β 0 , since the π + π = 0 case may be reduced to either zero or another case by the alternating property. In this case, from the expression π = 0 πΏ ( β π ) = 1 2 d i m β‘ π₯ β π = 1 ( β π β π : π β€ π β π ( π β π ) β π ( β π ) + β π β π : π > π β π ( β π ) β π ( π β π ) ) it follows
[ πΏ ( π ) , πΏ ( β π ) ] = 1 2 d i m β‘ π₯ β π = 1 ( β π β π : π β€ π [ πΏ ( π ) , β π ( π β π ) β π ( β π ) ] + β π§ β π : π > π [ πΏ ( π ) , β π ( β π ) β π ( π β π ) ] ) = 1 2 d i m β‘ π₯ β π = 1 ( β π β π : π β€ π ( [ πΏ ( π ) , β π ( π β π ) ] β π ( β π ) + β π ( π β π ) [ πΏ ( π ) , β π ( β π ) ] ) + β π§ β π : π > π ( [ πΏ ( π ) , β π ( β π ) ] β π ( π β π ) + β π ( β π ) [ πΏ ( π ) , β π ( π β π ) ] ) ) = 1 2 d i m β‘ π₯ β π = 1 ( β π β π : π β€ π ( ( π β π ) β π ( π ) β π ( β π ) + π β π ( π β π ) β π ( π β π ) ) + β π§ β π : π > π ( π β π ( π β π ) β π ( π β π ) + ( π β π ) β π ( β π ) β π ( π ) ) ) = 1 2 d i m β‘ π₯ β π = 1 ( β π β π : π β€ π ( π β π ) β π ( π ) β π ( β π ) + β π β π : π β€ 0 ( π + π ) β π ( π ) β π ( β π ) + β π§ β π : π > 0 ( π + π ) β π ( β π ) β π ( π ) + β π§ β π : π > π ( π β π ) β π ( β π ) β π ( π ) ) = 2 π πΏ ( 0 ) + πΎ π , β π where
is some constant which we get from the πΎ π , β π term and reversing the order of some π½ 0 where necessary.11 β π ( β π ) β ( π ) We will compute
using the application of of πΎ π , β π to a vacuum vector of [ πΏ ( π ) , πΏ ( β π ) ] , e.g. π . We note the following facts: From above there is a unique contravariant form such that π£ πΌ and ( π£ πΌ , π£ πΌ ) = 1 ( β ( π ) π£ , π€ ) = ( π£ , β ( β π ) π€ ) ( π π£ , π€ ) = ( π£ , π π€ ) for
, β β π₯ , and π β π . It follows by the definition of π£ , π€ β π that πΏ ( π ) ( πΏ ( π ) π£ , π€ ) = ( π£ , πΏ ( β π ) π€ ) for
and π β β€ . We also have π£ , π€ β π d i m β‘ π₯ β π = 1 β π ( 0 ) 2 π£ πΌ = β¨ πΌ , β π β© β¨ πΌ , β π β© π£ πΌ = β¨ πΌ , πΌ β© π£ πΌ Now consider the case
. Then π > 0 πΎ π , β π = ( π£ πΌ , πΎ π , β π π£ πΌ ) = ( π£ πΌ , ( [ πΏ ( π ) , πΏ ( β π ) ] β 2 π πΏ ( 0 ) ) π£ πΌ ) = ( π£ πΌ , ( πΏ ( π ) πΏ ( β π ) β 2 π πΏ ( 0 ) ) π£ πΌ ) = ( πΏ ( β π ) π£ πΌ , πΏ ( β π ) π£ πΌ ) β 2 π ( π£ πΌ , πΏ ( 0 ) π£ πΌ ) = 1 4 d i m β‘ π₯ β π = 1 d i m β‘ π₯ β π = 1 ( β π β π : 0 β€ π β€ π β π ( π β π ) β π ( β π ) π£ πΌ , β β β π : 0 β€ β β€ π β π ( β β π ) β π ( β β ) π£ πΌ ) = β β‘ π ( π£ πΌ , d i m β‘ π₯ β π = 1 β π ( 0 ) 2 π£ πΌ ) [ 0 β π ] β 2 π π½ 0 d i m β‘ π₯ = 1 4 d i m β‘ π₯ β π = 1 ( π£ πΌ , ( β π β π : 0 β€ π β€ π β π ( π ) β π ( π β π ) ) ( β β β π : 0 β€ β β€ π β π ( β β π ) β π ( β β ) ) π£ πΌ ) = β β‘ π β¨ πΌ , πΌ β© [ 0 β π ] β 2 π π½ 0 d i m β‘ π₯ where we have used an Iverson bracket and the fact that for
we can commute the positively graded operators to annihilate π β π . Now consider each of the terms π£ πΌ π π , π , π , β = ( π£ πΌ , β π ( π ) β π ( π β π ) β π ( β β π ) β π ( β β ) π£ πΌ ) where
, so that 0 β€ π , β β€ π πΎ π , β π = 1 4 d i m β‘ π₯ β π = 1 β π β π : 0 β€ π β€ π β β β π : 0 β€ β β€ π π π , π , π , β β π β¨ πΌ , πΌ β© [ 0 β π ] β 2 π π½ 0 d i m β‘ π₯ We have the following cases
for π π , π , π , β = 0 , since we may again commute and annihilate; β β { π , π β π } for π π , π , π , β = π ( π£ πΌ , β π ( 0 ) 2 π£ πΌ ) whence π β { 0 , π } ;12 β β { 0 , π } otherwise π π , π , π , β = 1 Thus
πΎ π , β π = 1 4 d i m β‘ π₯ β π = 1 β β β β β π β { 0 , π } β© π β β β { 0 , π } β© π π ( π£ πΌ , β π ( 0 ) 2 π£ πΌ ) + β π β π : 0 < π < π β β β { π , π β π } 1 β β β β = β β‘ π β¨ πΌ , πΌ β© [ 0 β π ] β 2 π π½ 0 d i m β‘ π₯ = π β¨ πΌ , πΌ β© [ 0 β π ] + 1 4 ( d i m β‘ π₯ ) β£ { ( π , β ) β π 2 : 0 < π < π , β β { π , π β π } } β£ = β β‘ π β¨ πΌ , πΌ β© [ 0 β π ] β 2 π π½ 0 d i m β‘ π₯ = 1 4 ( d i m β‘ π₯ ) β£ { ( π , β ) β π 2 : 0 < π < π , β β { π , π β π } } β£ β 2 π π½ 0 d i m β‘ π₯ = 1 2 ( d i m β‘ π₯ ) ( β π β π : 0 < π < π π ( π β π ) β 4 π π½ 0 ) = d i m β‘ π₯ 1 2 ( π 3 β π ) as required.
In fact, the choice
for
and
See also
Footnotes
-
β©c h a r β‘ π = 0 -
Note that the even subspace of
underπ₯ is trivial, so the ^decomposition matches the above. β©π = β 1 -
This is my own terminology, FLM do not give a name for these constructions. β©
-
1988. Vertex operator algebras and the Monster, Β§1.7, pp. 24β25 β©
-
This works because
. β©Λ π₯ = ( Λ π₯ β π π ) Γ π₯ -
1988. Vertex operator algebras and the Monster, Β§1.8, pp. 29β30 β©
-
1988. Vertex operator algebras and the Monster, Β§1.9 pp. 34β35 β©
-
Since in either of these cases
carries a trivial representation ofπ π£ πΌ . In fact, FLM only defineπ€ π this way forπ and do not use a tensor product construction forπ = β€ . β©π = β€ + 1 2 -
1988. Vertex operator algebras and the Monster, Β§1.9, p. 41 β©
-
1988. Vertex operator algebras and the Monster, Β§1.9 pp. 35β42. This seems to be the first theorem in the book. β©
-
It should already be clear at this point that
exhibit a central extension of the Witt algebra, which must be equivalent to the Virasoro algebra. It turns out that the Virasoro algebra, and these operators, are engineered precisely so thatπΏ ( π ) gives the right coΓ«fficient. β©πΎ π , β π -
In this calculation, keep the canonical realization of the Heisenberg commutation relations in mind. β©