Contravariant form on a triangular module
Let
and let
for allπ ( π₯ β π£ , π€ ) = π ( π£ , π ( π₯ ) β π€ ) andπ₯ β π€ π£ , π€ β π ( π ) π ( π£ π , π£ π ) = 1
Proof
Note that
extends to an involutive antiautomorphism of the universal enveloping algebra π so that π : π ( π€ ) π¨ π© β π ( π€ ) π ( π₯ π¦ ) = π ( π¦ ) π ( π₯ ) for
. π₯ , π¦ β π ( π€ ) First we prove uniqueness of
. Clearly ^F1 extends to π π ( π₯ β π£ , π€ ) = π ( π£ , π ( π₯ ) π€ ) for
and π₯ β π ( π€ ) . π£ , π€ β π ( π ) Note by the PoincarΓ©-Birkhoff-Witt theorem
π ( π€ ) = π΅ πΎ πΌ π π π ( π« β ) β π ( π₯ ) β π ( π« + ) = π΅ πΎ πΌ π π ( π β π« β π ( π« β ) ) β π ( π₯ ) β ( π β π ( π« + ) π« + ) = π΅ πΎ πΌ π π π« β π ( π« β ) β π ( π₯ ) β π ( π« + ) π« + β π« β π ( π« β ) β π ( π₯ ) β π ( π₯ ) β π ( π« + ) π« + β π ( π₯ ) = π΅ πΎ πΌ π π ( π« β π ( π« β ) π ( π₯ ) π ( π« + ) + π« β π ( π« β ) π ( π₯ ) + π ( π₯ ) π ( π« + ) π« + ) β π ( π₯ ) = π΅ πΎ πΌ π π ( π« β π ( π€ ) + π ( π€ ) π« + ) β π ( π₯ ) so we may define the projection operator
π : π ( π€ ) β π ( π₯ ) = π΄ π π π π π π π β ( π₯ ) Given any
by irreducibility π£ , π€ β π ( π ) π£ = π₯ β π£ π π€ = π¦ β π£ π for some
so π₯ , π¦ β π ( π€ ) π ( π£ , π€ ) = π ( π₯ β π£ π , π¦ β π£ π ) = π ( π£ π , π ( π₯ ) π¦ β π£ π ) Since
is a vacuum vector and π£ π π ( π£ π , π« β π ( π€ ) β π£ π ) = π ( π« + β π£ π , π ( π€ ) β π£ π ) = 0 it follows
π ( π£ , π€ ) = π ( π£ π , π ( π₯ ) π¦ β π£ π ) = π ( π£ π , π ( π ( π₯ ) π¦ ) β π£ π ) = π ( π£ π , π ( π ( π ( π₯ ) π¦ ) ) π£ π ) = π ( π ( π ( π₯ ) π¦ ) ) Therefore the behaviour of
is completely determined by properties ^F1 and ^F2, so if π exists it is unique. π To prove existence, consider the annihilator of
π£ π π = π ( π€ ) ( π« + + β β β π₯ π ( β β π ( β ) 1 ) ) which is a left-ideal
. Thus π ( π€ ) π : π ( π€ ) / π β π ( π ) π₯ + β β¦ π₯ β π£ π is a
-module isomorphism. Now π€ π ( π₯ π¦ ) = π ( π₯ ) π¦ π ( π¦ π₯ ) = π¦ π ( π₯ ) for
and π₯ β π ( π€ ) , whence π¦ β π ( π₯ ) π ( π ( π ) ) = π ( π ( π ( π ) ) ) = 0 Thus the above formula
π ( π₯ β π£ π , π¦ β π£ π ) = π ( π ( π ( π₯ ) π¦ ) ) for
is well-defined, since π₯ , π¦ β π ( π€ ) π ( π₯ π¦ ) π§ = π ( π¦ ) π ( π₯ ) π§ π ( π ( π ( 1 ) 1 ) ) = 1 for
. Therewithal since π₯ , π¦ , π§ β π ( π€ ) π β π = π β π it follows
π ( π ( π ( π¦ ) π₯ ) ) = π ( π ( π ( π ( π₯ ) π¦ ) ) ) = π ( π ( π ( π ( π₯ ) π¦ ) ) ) = π ( π ( π ( π₯ ) π¦ ) ) for
, so π₯ , π¦ β π ( π€ ) is ^symmetric. π
See also the special case of a Hermitian contravariant form on a complex triangular module.
Footnotes
-
i.e.
for anyπ π β = π β . β©β β π₯