QM of a particle in a harmonic oscillator
A particle in the harmonic oscillator potential
where
with all stationary states and their energies given by
where
are the so-called ladder operators (see properties below).
Proof of solutions
The time independent SchrΓΆdinger equation is
1 2 π ( Λ π 2 + ( π π Λ π₯ ) 2 ) π = πΈ π which is only normalizable for
(see). Motivated by finding a βdifference of perfect squaresβ like representation for πΈ > 0 ,1 we define the ladder operators given above with the properties listed below. thus the time-independent SchrΓΆdinger equation becomes Λ π» β π ( Λ π Β± Λ π β Β± 1 2 ) π = πΈ π Crucially,
have the property that given a solution Λ π Β± to the TISE, then Λ π» π = πΈ π also solve the SchrΓΆdinger equation: Λ π Β± π Λ π» ( Λ π Β± π ) = β π ( Λ π Β± Λ π β Β± 1 2 ) ( Λ π Β± π ) = β π ( Λ π Β± Λ π β Λ π Β± Β± 1 2 Λ π Β± ) π = β π Λ π Β± ( Λ π β Λ π Β± Β± 1 2 ) π = Λ π Β± β π ( Λ π Β± Λ π β Β± 1 Β± 1 2 ) π = Λ π Β± ( Λ π» Β± β π ) π = Λ π Β± ( πΈ Β± β π ) π = ( πΈ Β± β π ) Λ π Β± π which also follows from the defining property of Ladder operators. Since successively applying
lowers energy, and normalizable solutions have nonnegative energy, the sequence must terminate with Λ π β . Finding this βbottom rungβ amounts to solving the differential equation Λ π β π 0 = 0 π π 0 π π₯ = β π π β π₯ π 0 is a First-order linear differential equation with normalized solution
π 0 ( π₯ ) = ( π π π β ) 1 / 4 π β π π π₯ 2 / 2 β All normalizable solutions must be given by the ladder operators, since otherwise an alternate bottom rung could be found.
Orthonormality
It follows from ^LP8 and ^LP9 that
| π π β© = 1 β π ! ( Λ π + ) π | π 0 β© hence the states given above are normalized. Orthogonality is manifest in
π β¨ π π | π π β© = β¨ π π | Λ π + Λ π β | π π β© = β¨ π π | ( Λ π + Λ π β ) β | π π β© = π β¨ π π | π π β© and hence
, implying ( π β π ) β¨ π π | π π β© = 0 for β¨ π π | π π β© = 0 . π β π
An alternate representation in terms of Hermite polynomials2 is3
Properties
- The harmonic oscillator potential is a good approximation for many potentials with a minimum at
, since0 .π ( π₯ ) = π ( 0 ) + π β² ( 0 ) π₯ + 1 2 π β³ ( 0 ) π₯ 2 + β― - The following general equations for expectation values hold for a stationary state
| π π β© β¨ Λ π₯ β© = 0 β¨ Λ π β© = 0 β¨ Λ π₯ 2 β© = ( π Λ π₯ ) 2 = πΈ π / π π 2 = ( π + 1 2 ) β π π β¨ Λ π 2 β© = ( π Λ π ) 2 = π πΈ π = ( π + 1 2 ) π β π β¨ π β© = 1 2 π π 2 β¨ Λ π₯ 2 β© = πΈ π 2 = ( π + 1 2 ) β π 2 β¨ π β© = β¨ π 2 β© 2 π = πΈ π 2 = ( π + 1 2 ) β π 2
Proof of 2
Clearly
by Integration properties, proving ^Ex. Invoking various Properties of the ladder operators β¨ π π | Λ π₯ | π π β© = β« β β β π₯ | π π ( π₯ ) | 2 π π₯ = 0 β¨ π π | Λ π | π π β© = π β β π π 2 β¨ π π | ( Λ π + β Λ π β ) | π π β© = π β β π π 2 ( β¨ π π | Λ π + | π π β© β β¨ π π | Λ π β | π π β© ) = π β β π π 2 ( β π + 1 β¨ π π | π π + 1 β© β β π + 1 β¨ π π + 1 | π π β© ) = 0 β¨ π π | Λ π₯ 2 | π π β© = β 2 π π β¨ π π | ( Λ π + + Λ π β ) 2 | π π β© = β 2 π π β¨ π π | ( ( Λ π + ) 2 + ( Λ π β ) 2 + { Λ π + , Λ π β } ) | π π β© = β 2 π π ( β¨ π π | ( Λ π + ) 2 | π π β© + β¨ π π | ( Λ π β ) 2 | π π β© + 2 β π β¨ π π | Λ π» | π π β© ) = πΈ π π π 2 = ( π + 1 2 ) β π π β¨ π π | Λ π 2 | π π β© = β β π π 2 β¨ π π | ( Λ π + β Λ π β ) 2 | π π β© = β β π π 2 β¨ π π | ( ( Λ π + ) 2 + ( Λ π β ) 2 β { Λ π + , Λ π β } ) | π π β© = β β π π 2 ( β¨ π π | ( Λ π + ) 2 | π π β© + β¨ π π | ( Λ π β ) 2 | π π β© β 2 β π β¨ π π | Λ π» | π π β© ) = π πΈ π = ( π + 1 2 ) π β π proving ^Ep, ^Ex2, and ^Ep2, whence ^EV and ^ET immediately follow.
Properties of the ladder operators
Λ π β Λ π Β± = Λ π» β π Β± 1 2 [ Λ π β , Λ π + ] = 1 Λ π» = β π ( Λ π Β± Λ π β Β± 1 2 ) [ Λ π» , Λ π Β± ] = Β± β π Λ π Β± ( Λ π Β± ) β = Λ π β Λ π₯ = β β 2 π π ( Λ π + + Λ π β ) Λ π = π β β π π 2 ( Λ π + β Λ π β ) Λ π + | π π β© = β π + 1 | π π + 1 β© forΛ π β | π π β© = β π | π π β 1 β© π > 0 { Λ π Β± , Λ π β } = 2 Λ π» β π
Proof of 1β5, 8β10
Properties 1β3 and 10 follow from
Λ π β Λ π Β± = 1 2 β π π ( Λ π 2 + ( π π Λ π₯ ) 2 ) β π 2 β [ Λ π₯ , Λ π ] = Λ π» β π Β± 1 2 For ^LP4 note
[ Λ π» , Λ π Β± ] = [ β π ( Λ π Β± Λ π β Β± 1 2 ) , Λ π Β± ] = β π [ Λ π Β± Λ π β , Λ π Β± ] Β± β π [ 1 2 , Λ π Β± ] = β π ( Λ π Β± Λ π β Λ π Β± β Λ π Β± Λ π Β± Λ π β ) = β π Λ π Β± [ Λ π β , Λ π Β± ] = Β± β π Λ π Β± which shows that these are indeed ladder operators, and thus ^LP5 follows from ^P1.4
From ^LP5 we have
β¨ π π | ( Λ π Β± ) β Λ π Β± | π π β© = β¨ π π | Λ π β Λ π Β± | π π β© but from the SchrΓΆdinger equation, ^LP3, and the ^energies formula, it follows that
Λ π + Λ π β | π π β© = π | π π β© , Λ π β Λ π + | π π β© = ( π + 1 ) | π π β© hence
β¨ π π | ( Λ π + ) β Λ π + | π π β© = β¨ π π | Λ π β Λ π + | π π β© = ( π + 1 ) β¨ π π | π π β© β¨ π π | ( Λ π β ) β Λ π β | π π β© = β¨ π π | Λ π + Λ π β | π π β© = π β¨ π π | π π β© thus if
and | π π β© are normalized, | π π Β± 1 β© and Λ π + | π π β© = β π + 1 | π π + 1 β© , proving ^LP8 and ^LP9 Λ π β | π π β© = β π | π π β 1 β©
Footnotes
-
2018. Introduction to quantum mechanics, Β§2.3.1, pp. 40ff β©
-
Normalized so that the highest power of
has coΓ«fficientπ . β©2 π -
2018. Introduction to quantum mechanics, Β§2.3.2, p. 52 β©
-
This follows from completeness since the behaviour of
matches that predicted by ^P1 forΛ π β all eigenfunctions, and therefore is the same operator. β©( Λ π + ) β