Connexion disagreement tensor
Let
and thus
Proof of tensoriality
We need to show that
is a
-linear map into . To this end let . Then by the Leibniz rule, as required.
A word of warning for physicists
Physicists might be uncomfortable with the assertion that
is a tensor, and most introductory general relativity courses will spend a lot of time stressing that connexion coëfficients such as the Christoffel symbols are not tensors. Depending on perspective this is either a misunderstanding or disagreement. The connexion coëfficients for a coördinate chart is not covariant since it depended on the choice of coördinate chart, but if you consider the partial derivative as a local affine connexion as extra data attached to our manifold which we retain after change of coördinates, they suddenly are tensorial.
In particular, given local coördinates
or in components
We call
Covariant derivative disagreement on vector fields
With the same notation as above, let
Proof
Let
and . Then since covariant derivatives all agree with the exterior derivative on scalar fields, we have Therefore by the Leibniz rule
for all
. The conclusion follows.
Covariant derivative disagreement on tensor fields
With the same notation as above, let
In other words, to convert from one connexion to the other for the covariant derivative of a general tensor field
- add a contraction with each upper index of
, - subtract a contraction with each lower index of
.
Other properties
- If both
and are torsion-free, or more generally if they have the same Contorsion tensor, then is symmetric in its lower indices.
Footnotes
-
2009. General relativity, §1.1, pp. 32–33. ↩