Central group extension
A group extension of
is called central iff
Second cohomology
Identifying
and the 2-cocycles
and the 2-coboundaries
for some 1-cochain
Correspondence between 2-cocycles and central extensions
Given any \Set-section
with identity
and for the associated section
Proof
That
follows from the the fact cosets of πΊ = { π π e π : π β π΄ ; π β π΅ } partition π΅ . Next we claim πΊ e π 0 ( π , π ) = π β 1 π π π π π π defines a 2-cocycle. Note that
, hence the formula is well-defined. Letting π ( π β 1 π π π π π π ) = 1 denote the inverse of l n , we have e x p = π 0 ( π , π ) β π 0 ( π , π π ) + π 0 ( π π , π ) β π 0 ( π , π ) = l n β‘ ( π β 1 π π π π π π ) β l n β‘ ( π β 1 π π π π π π π π ) + l n β‘ ( π β 1 π π π π π π π π ) β l n β‘ ( π β 1 π π π π π π ) = l n β‘ ( π β 1 π π π π π π ) + l n β‘ ( π β 1 π π π β 1 π π π π π π ) β l n β‘ ( π β 1 π π π π π π ) = l n β‘ ( π β 1 π π π π π π ) + l n β‘ ( π β 1 π π β 1 π π β 1 π π π π π π ) = l n β‘ ( π β 1 π π π π π π ) + l n β‘ ( π β 1 π π β 1 π π π π ) = 0 as required, where we have used centrality of
. π β 1 π π β 1 π π π π Now given a 2-cocycle
we define the following multiplication on the set π 0 β π 2 ( π΄ , π΅ ) π΅ Γ π΄ ( π , π ) β ( π , π ) = ( π + π + π 0 ( π , π ) , π π ) which clearly constitutes a monoid since
( π , π ) β ( β π 0 ( 1 , 1 ) , 1 ) = ( π β π 0 ( 1 , 1 ) + π 0 ( π , 1 ) , π ) = ( π + π 0 ( π , 1 β 1 ) β π 0 ( π β 1 , 1 ) , π ) = ( π , π ) and likewise on the right. The inverse is easily seen to be given by
( π , π ) β 1 = ( β π β π 0 ( π , π β 1 ) β π 0 ( 1 , 1 ) , π β 1 ) Thus the given multiplication makes the set
a group which we denote π΅ Γ π΄ . Clearly we have the central extension πΊ 1 β π΅ e x p βͺ πΊ π β π΄ β 1 where
and e x p are given above. Letting π , we find Noting that π π = ( 0 , π ) π 0 ( π , 1 ) = π 0 ( 1 , 1 ) + π 0 ( π , 1 β 1 ) β π 0 ( π β 1 , 1 ) = π 0 ( 1 , 1 ) now
( 0 , π π ) e π 0 ( π , π ) = ( 0 , π π ) ( π 0 ( π , π ) β π 0 ( 1 , 1 ) , 1 ) = ( π 0 ( π , π ) β π 0 ( 1 , 1 ) + π 0 ( π π , 1 ) ) = ( π 0 ( π , π ) , 1 ) = ( 0 , π ) ( 0 , π ) as claimed.
This correspondence has the property
Central extensions are equivalent iff their 2-cocycles for some sections are cohomologous. Thus there is a bijection between
and equivalence classes of extensions. π» 2 ( π΄ , π΅ )
Proof
Consider the central extension
1 β π΅ e x p βͺ πΊ π β π΄ β 1 and let
be \Set-sections of π ( β ) , π‘ ( β ) : π΄ βͺ πΊ , and consider the corresponding 2-cycles π defined by π 0 , π 0 β π 2 ( π΄ , π΅ ) π π π π = π π π e π 0 ( π , π ) π‘ π π‘ π = π‘ π π e π 0 ( π , π ) Then, taking into account the fact
implies π ( π₯ ) = 1 , π₯ β π ( πΊ ) e π 0 ( π , π ) β π 0 ( π , π ) = π π π π π‘ β 1 π π‘ β 1 π π‘ π π π β 1 π π = π π π‘ β 1 π π π π‘ β 1 π π‘ π π π β 1 π π so
π 0 ( π , π ) β π 0 ( π , π ) = l n β‘ ( π‘ π π π β 1 π π ) β l n β‘ ( π‘ π π β 1 π ) β l n β‘ ( π‘ π π β 1 π ) β π΅ 2 ( π΄ , π΅ ) thus different sections of
give cohomologous 2-cocycles. It immediately follows that equivalent central extensions will give cohomologous 2-cocycles. π For the converse, it is sufficient to show that given a central extension with a section
such that π ( β ) and a corresponding 2-cycle π 1 = 1 , the induced extension on G' =_{\Set} B \times A is equivalent. We show that the following commutes π 0 : π΄ Γ π΄ β π΅
where
π β² : ( π , π ) β¦ π e x p β² : π β¦ ( π β π 0 ( 1 , 1 ) , 1 ) = ( π , 1 ) π : π π e π β¦ ( π , π ) and
is an isomorphism. Note that for every π : πΊ β πΊ β² , π β πΊ for unique π = π π e π and π β π΄ , so π β π΅ is a well-defined bijection. Further, for any π and π , π β π΄ π , π β π΅ π ( π π e π π π e π ) = π ( π π π π e π + π ) = π ( π π π e π + π + π 0 ( π , π ) ) = ( π + π + π 0 ( π , π ) , π π ) = ( π , π ) ( π , π ) = π ( π π e π ) π ( π π e π ) so
is a group isomorphism, and π π ( e x p β‘ π ) = π ( π 1 e π ) = ( π , 1 ) = e x p β² β‘ π π β² π ( π π e π ) = π β² ( π , π ) = π = π ( π π e π ) so the diagram commutes, as required.
Special cases
Footnotes
-
1988. Vertex operator algebras and the Monster, Β§5.1, p. 103 β©